Cyber Exercises

// Full spectrum coverage  ·  Updated 2026  ·  CMTA Cyber

Overview

Cyber exercises are structured activities designed to test, validate, and improve an organization's security capabilities. They range from low-stakes tabletop discussions to full-scale red vs. blue simulations and are essential for building organizational resilience before a real incident occurs.

This reference covers the full spectrum - from executive tabletop exercises and purple team engagements to CTF platforms for individual skill development and CISA-provided frameworks for government and critical infrastructure organizations.

// Tip
Exercises are most effective when conducted regularly - not just after an incident. Build them into your security program calendar at least quarterly.
Exercise Type Audience Complexity Best For
Tabletop (TTX)Leadership + TechnicalLowDecision making, IR planning
Functional DrillTechnical TeamsMediumSpecific process validation
Purple TeamRed + Blue TeamsMediumDetection gap analysis
Red Team ExerciseWhole organizationHighRealistic adversary simulation
Full-Scale SimulationEnterprise-wideHighEnd-to-end resilience testing
CTFIndividual / TeamVariesSkill development

Tabletop Exercises (TTX)

A tabletop exercise is a discussion-based session where team members walk through a simulated scenario to identify gaps in plans, policies, and communication. No live systems are involved - the goal is to test decision-making and coordination.

TTX Structure

PhaseDurationDescription
Preparation2-4 weeks priorDefine objectives, select scenario, invite participants, brief facilitator
Scenario Inject 115-30 minInitial incident notification - what do you do first?
Discussion20-30 minTeams discuss actions, decisions, escalation paths
Scenario Inject 215-30 minSituation escalates - media attention, data confirmed exfiltrated
Discussion20-30 minCrisis communication, legal, executive decisions
Scenario Inject 315-30 minRecovery phase - systems restored, lessons emerging
Hot Wash30-45 minImmediate debrief - what worked, what didn't, action items
After Action Report1-2 weeks afterWritten findings, gaps identified, remediation plan

Common TTX Scenarios

TTX Facilitation Tips

// Facilitation
The best tabletops are realistic, slightly uncomfortable, and end with honest conversation. Push participants to make real decisions - not theoretical ones.

Purple Team Exercises

Purple team exercises bring red team (offensive) and blue team (defensive) together in a collaborative session to improve detection and response capabilities. Unlike adversarial red team engagements, purple team is transparent and cooperative.

Purple Team Methodology

StepRed Team ActionBlue Team Action
1. PlanSelect ATT&CK technique to simulateReview existing detections for that technique
2. ExecuteRun the attack technique in controlled environmentMonitor SIEM/EDR for alerts
3. DetectDocument exactly what was executedIdentify if/how the technique was detected
4. Gap AnalysisShare IOCs and attack artifactsDetermine why detection succeeded or failed
5. ImproveProvide recommendations for loggingTune detection rules, add new alerts
6. RetestRe-execute the same techniqueValidate improved detection

MITRE ATT&CK Techniques to Start With

Open Source Purple Team Tools

# Atomic Red Team - MITRE ATT&CK mapped attack simulations
https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team

# Caldera - automated adversary emulation platform
https://github.com/mitre/caldera

# VECTR - purple team tracking and reporting
https://github.com/SecurityRiskAdvisors/VECTR

# ATT&CK Navigator - visualize coverage
https://mitre-attack.github.io/attack-navigator/

# Stratus Red Team - cloud attack simulation
https://github.com/DataDog/stratus-red-team

Red Team Exercises

Red team exercises simulate a real adversary targeting your organization with a specific goal - access to a crown jewel system, exfiltration of sensitive data, or disruption of operations. Unlike penetration tests, red team engagements are goal-oriented and covert.

Red Team vs Penetration Test

AttributePenetration TestRed Team Exercise
GoalFind as many vulnerabilities as possibleAchieve a specific objective
Duration1-4 weeks4-12 weeks
ScopeDefined and broadMinimal restrictions
Blue Team awareSometimesNo - stealth is required
Report focusVulnerability listAttack narrative and detection gaps
ValueVulnerability coverageRealistic adversary simulation

Red Team Exercise Phases

CTF Resources

Capture The Flag competitions are gamified cybersecurity challenges where participants solve security puzzles to find hidden flags. Excellent for individual skill development across offensive and defensive domains.

CTF Categories

CategoryDescriptionTools to Know
WebSQL injection, XSS, SSRF, authentication bypassBurp Suite, SQLmap, curl
Binary ExploitationBuffer overflows, format strings, ROP chainsGDB, pwndbg, pwntools
Reverse EngineeringAnalyze binaries, obfuscated code, malwareGhidra, IDA Free, Radare2
CryptographyBreak ciphers, RSA attacks, hash crackingCyberChef, hashcat, Python
ForensicsFile carving, steganography, memory analysisAutopsy, Volatility, binwalk
OSINTInformation gathering from public sourcesGoogle, Shodan, OSINT Framework
Pwn/MiscMixed challenges, creative problem solvingVaries by challenge

CTF Platforms

PlatformFocusCostLevel
CTFtime.orgCTF competition calendar and archiveFreeAll
PicoCTFBeginner-friendly, Carnegie Mellon hostedFreeBeginner
CTFlearnCommunity CTF challengesFreeBeginner
HackTheBox CTFCompetitive CTF eventsFree/PaidIntermediate
247CTFPermanent always-on challengesFreeIntermediate
pwn.collegeBinary exploitation focusedFreeAdvanced
CryptoHackCryptography challengesFreeAll

CTF Tips for Beginners

Practice Lab Platforms

Practice lab platforms provide legal, controlled environments to develop offensive and defensive security skills through guided learning paths, vulnerable machines, and real-world scenarios.

PlatformFocusCostBest For
HackTheBox (HTB)Offensive - machines and challengesFree/VIPPentesters, red teamers
TryHackMeGuided learning paths, beginner-friendlyFree/PremiumBeginners, structured learning
PentesterLabWeb application security focusFree/ProWeb app pentesters
VulnHubDownloadable vulnerable VMsFreeOffline practice, OSCP prep
PortSwigger Web AcademyWeb vulnerabilities - OWASPFreeWeb app security, Burp Suite
OWASP WebGoatDeliberately insecure web appFreeWeb security learning
DVWADamn Vulnerable Web ApplicationFreeWeb security basics
BlueTeamLabs OnlineBlue team investigationsFree/PremiumSOC analysts, DFIR
CyberDefendersBlue team DFIR challengesFree/ProSOC analysts, threat hunters
LetsDefendSOC simulation platformFree/PremiumSOC Tier 1/2 analysts
Immersive LabsEnterprise skill developmentPaidEnterprise teams
RangeForceCyber range - team exercisesPaidTeam training

Recommended Learning Paths

// Path: Web App Pentester
PortSwigger Web Academy → PentesterLab → TryHackMe Web paths → HackTheBox Web challenges → Real bug bounty programs
// Path: SOC Analyst
TryHackMe SOC Level 1 → LetsDefend → CyberDefenders → BlueTeamLabs → Security Onion home lab
// Path: OSCP Preparation
TryHackMe Beginner path → VulnHub easy machines → HackTheBox retired machines → TCM Security courses → PWK/OSCP

Incident Response Simulations

IR simulations test your team's ability to detect, contain, eradicate, and recover from a real incident. Unlike tabletop exercises, IR simulations involve live systems, actual tools, and time pressure.

IR Simulation Scenario Templates

Scenario 1: Ransomware

Scenario 2: Phishing to Credential Theft

Scenario 3: Insider Threat

IR Simulation Checklist

PRE-SIMULATION
[ ] Define objectives and success criteria
[ ] Select and brief the facilitator
[ ] Notify IT/security leadership (white cell)
[ ] Prepare injects and timeline
[ ] Set up out-of-band communication channel
[ ] Brief participants on rules of engagement

DURING SIMULATION
[ ] Record all actions taken with timestamps
[ ] Capture tool outputs and logs
[ ] Note communication delays and gaps
[ ] Track escalation decisions
[ ] Document assumptions made under pressure

POST-SIMULATION
[ ] Conduct immediate hot wash (30 min)
[ ] Collect participant feedback forms
[ ] Review timeline of actions vs expected
[ ] Identify detection gaps and tool failures
[ ] Document lessons learned
[ ] Assign remediation owners and deadlines
[ ] Schedule follow-up exercise to validate fixes

CISA Exercise Frameworks

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) provides free exercise frameworks, scenario libraries, and facilitation guides primarily aimed at government and critical infrastructure organizations - but applicable to any organization.

CISA Exercise Programs

ProgramDescriptionAccess
CISA Tabletop Exercise Packages (CTEPs)Pre-built TTX packages for critical infrastructure sectors. Includes facilitator guides, participant handbooks, and scenario injects.Free - cisa.gov
Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)FEMA-managed framework for designing, conducting, and evaluating exercises. Industry standard for government exercises.Free - fema.gov
National Cyber Exercise (NCE)Annual national-level cyber exercise coordinated by CISA involving government and private sector.Invite only
CyberStormLarge-scale national cybersecurity exercise series testing public-private information sharing and response.Invite only
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV)Use KEV catalog as scenario basis for realistic vulnerability exercises.Free - cisa.gov/kev
// Resource
CISA offers free facilitation support for critical infrastructure organizations running tabletop exercises. Request support at cisa.gov/resources-tools/programs/exercise

Cyber Range Concepts

A cyber range is a virtual environment that replicates real-world IT and OT infrastructure for training, testing, and exercise purposes. Ranges can be cloud-based, on-premises, or hybrid.

Open Source Cyber Range Tools

ToolPurposeNotes
DetectionLabPre-built Windows AD lab for detection and loggingVagrant/VMware/AWS
GOAD (Game of Active Directory)Vulnerable Active Directory lab for pentest practiceVagrant + Ansible
LudusAutomated cyber range builder on ProxmoxSelf-hosted
Security OnionFull SOC platform - IDS, SIEM, PCAPVM or bare metal
VelociraptorEndpoint visibility and hunting platformFree, open source
OpenStackBuild your own cloud range infrastructureComplex setup

Home Lab Minimum Viable Setup

# Minimum hardware recommendation
RAM:    16GB (32GB preferred)
CPU:    4 cores (8 preferred)
Storage: 500GB SSD

# Core components
Hypervisor:     VirtualBox (free) or VMware Workstation
Attack Machine: Kali Linux or Parrot OS
Target:         Windows Server 2019 + Windows 10 client
Detection:      Security Onion or ELK Stack
AD Lab:         DetectionLab or GOAD

# Quick start with DetectionLab
git clone https://github.com/clong/DetectionLab
cd DetectionLab/Vagrant
vagrant up dc logger wef win10

Exercise Planning Guide

A structured approach to planning any cyber exercise - from tabletop to full simulation.

8-Week Exercise Planning Timeline

WeekActivitiesOwner
Week 1-2Define objectives, scope, and exercise type. Identify participants and stakeholders. Get leadership approval.Exercise Lead
Week 3-4Select or develop scenario. Build inject timeline. Assign facilitator and observer roles.Exercise Lead + Facilitator
Week 5Develop participant materials - scenario overview, role assignments, rules of engagement.Exercise Lead
Week 6Brief facilitators and observers. Conduct dry run if full-scale exercise. Finalize logistics.Facilitator
Week 7Send participant pre-read materials. Confirm attendance. Set up exercise environment if technical.Exercise Lead
Week 8Execute exercise. Conduct hot wash. Collect feedback forms.All
Week 9-10Draft After Action Report. Review with leadership. Assign remediation tasks with owners and deadlines.Exercise Lead

After Action Report (AAR) Template

AFTER ACTION REPORT
Exercise: [Name]
Date: [Date]
Classification: [Internal Use Only / Confidential]

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
   Brief overview of exercise, key findings, and top recommendations.

2. EXERCISE OVERVIEW
   - Type: Tabletop / Functional / Full-Scale
   - Scenario: [Brief description]
   - Participants: [Teams/roles represented]
   - Objectives: [What we set out to test]

3. STRENGTHS OBSERVED
   - What worked well
   - Processes that functioned as designed
   - Strong individual/team performances

4. AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT
   - Gaps identified in detection
   - Communication breakdowns
   - Missing playbooks or procedures
   - Tool/technology gaps

5. RECOMMENDATIONS
   Priority  | Recommendation         | Owner  | Due Date
   --------- | ---------------------- | ------ | --------
   Critical  | [Action item]          | [Name] | [Date]
   High      | [Action item]          | [Name] | [Date]
   Medium    | [Action item]          | [Name] | [Date]

6. NEXT EXERCISE
   Recommended date, type, and focus areas based on this AAR.